Skip to navigationSkip to contentSkip to footerHelp using this website - Accessibility statement
Advertisement
Analysis

Openpay’s remorse fuels buy now, pay later’s critics

The buy now, pay later sector’s regulation is questioned upon revelations Openpay charges customers who die default fees, as it pushes into healthcare lending.

Tom Richardson
Tom RichardsonJournalist

Subscribe to gift this article

Gift 5 articles to anyone you choose each month when you subscribe.

Subscribe now

Already a subscriber?

Australia’s ballooning buy now, pay later industry faces accusations it’s in a Hunger Games-style race to the bottom, with corporate regulator ASIC asleep at the regulatory wheel.

On Thursday, $290 million ASX-listed buy now, pay later, player Openpay said it would scrap existing terms and conditions that made a borrower liable for default fees in the event of death.

Openpay CEO Michael Eidel says it will update its terms and conditions so that death is no longer an event of default. 

On March 15, Openpay boasted to ASX investors that its agreement with private healthcare group St John of God Health made it the first buy now, pay later business in Australia to enter the hospitals segment and help patients split payments for important needs like elective surgery.

Its existing terms and conditions assign the right to claim full payment of amounts owed within 14 days and an immediate default fee if any borrower dies, even in an operating theatre, with outstanding payments due. Late fees also currently apply to borrowers if an instalment is not paid when due.

“This gives you an idea of what happens when you don’t have regulation,” said Bradford Kelly the managing director of Payment Services Ltd.

Advertisement

“They said death is an act of default – meaning as soon as you default we’re going to charge you egregious fees and we’re going to call on the entire amount on the spot.”

Mr Kelly said: “On top of that, Openpay is not a bank so this product is unregulated [unlike] bank or credit card lending. This deal is to fund elective surgery as well as people who incur a bill with St John of God."

Openpay’s chief executive, Michael Eidel, said it regularly updates its terms and conditions as new business develops and that it contemplated the circumstance of a customer death prior to announcing the hospital partnership.

“We will be updating our terms and conditions as of today so death is no longer an event of default,” Mr Eidel said.

“Meaning should a customer pass away their contract with us will come to an end and we will cease to collect any outstanding payments due. This update will be in place before Openpay’s agreement with St John of God Health Care formally goes live and will be effective across the business.”

Openpay shares have soared more than fivefold from 49¢ to $2.71 over the past year, amid wild investor enthusiasm for the loss-making sector, which has been allowed to partly self-regulate.

Advertisement

Payday lending territory

Under some public pressure over a lack of regulation the industry including Afterpay, Humm, Zip Co, Brighte, Klarna, Latitude, Payright, and Openpay agreed to a Code of Practice with the Australian Finance Industry Association (AFIA) on March 1.

The AFIA said the code goes above and beyond the law in Australia to set best practice standards for the sector and strengthen consumer protections. However, Mr Kelly slammed the code as largely useless: “It’s not regulation, it’s a voluntary code of conduct without any sanctions. It’s the equivalent of being flogged with a wet lettuce. It has absolutely no consequence,” said Mr Kelly.

“Another problem is there’s a carve out for customers where transaction amounts are under $2000. That’s Afterpay’s customers firstly, so they’ve exempted themselves from the additional checks under the code.”

Mr Kelly said because there were now so many buy now, pay later operators in Australia they were having to take on more risk to win market share. “What that means is some are vectoring into payday lending territory,” he said.

Advertisement

“So if you look at Beforepay, that’s a classic example. They offer a $300 advance on your salary. That’s payday lending, but they’re not lending at all apparently. So they’ve found a loophole and ASIC have a very hands off approach.”

In the UK, regulators are drawing up plans to require ASX-listed players like Afterpay, Zip, Openpay, and Laybuy to conduct credit or affordability checks before lending to consumers.

This week Afterpay announced its launch into Italy, Spain, and France, where European Union lawmakers have a reputation for tough consumer protection regulation.

In Australia, buy now, pay later lenders remain exempt from onerous credit protection laws under ASIC’s National Consumer Credit Protection Act 2009, which apply to credit card and home loan issuers like banks.

Tom Richardson writes and comments on markets including equities, debt, crypto, software, banking, payments, and regulation. He worked in asset management at Bank of New York Mellon and is a member of the CFA Society of the UK as a holder of the Investment Management Certificate. Connect with Tom on Twitter. Email Tom at tom.richardson@afr.com

Subscribe to gift this article

Gift 5 articles to anyone you choose each month when you subscribe.

Subscribe now

Already a subscriber?

Read More

Latest In Equity markets

Fetching latest articles

Most Viewed In Markets