Skip to content
NOWCAST NewsCenter 5 at 4:30
Live Now
Advertisement

Bay State companies most in need left out of federal relief loan program

Industries that could more easily shift to work-from-home got more federal aid

Bay State companies most in need left out of federal relief loan program

Industries that could more easily shift to work-from-home got more federal aid

WE WILL PRESENT THAT TO YOU IN A FEW MINUTES. EMILY: FIVE INVESTIGATES DIGGING DEEPER INTO THE $525 BILLION FEDERAL STIMULUS PACKAGE FOR SMALL BUSINESSES ED: THIS COMES AS LAWMAKERS LOOK INTO CREATING ANOTHER ROUND OF PAYCHECK PROTECTION PROGRAM FORGIVABLE LOANS. KAREN ANDERSON HAS MORE ON HOW SOME BUSINESSES THAT NEEDED THE HELP MOST WERE OFTEN HELPED THE LEAST. >> PREPARING FOR ITS LAST WEEKEND BEFORE HIBERNATION SHOULD -- BEFORE HIBERNATION. THE OWNER HOPING THEY COULD REOPEN IN THE SPRING UNLIKE HIS OTHER RESTAURANT SHUTTING FOR GOOD AFTER 20 YEARS IN THE NORTH END. >> EVERY DAY, WE HAVE TO ADAPT WHAT IS COMING. >> HE HOPED HE COULD KEEP IT OPEN WITH HELP FROM THE FEDERAL PAYCHECK PROTECTION PROGRAM. THE TERMS OF THE LOAN MEANT HE HAD TO USE MOST OF IT FOR PAYROLL. LIKE MANY RESTAURANTS, THAT WAS NOT THE BIGGEST EXPENSE PAID HE WAS PAYING $14,000 A MONTH NOT TO -- JUST TO RENT THE SPACE. >> I THINK FROM THE BEGINNING, THOSE LOANS WERE NOT FIT FOR US. >> THE PAYCHECK PROTECTION PROGRAM WAS SET UP TO GET A LOT OF MONEY OUT TO BILLIONS OF -- OUT TO BUSINESSES QUICKLY. THE WAY IT WAS DESIGNED TO SUPPORT PAYROLL ENDED UP FAVORING SOME INDUSTRIES. >> THE WAY WE DESIGNED THE PAYCHECK PROTECTION PROGRAM HAD A BIT OF A DESIGN FLAW. THE HARDEST HIT SECTORS TENDED TO RECEIVE THE LEAST AMOUNT OF AID. >> AND M.I.T. PROFESSORS SAYS THE FLAW WAS TYING PPP LOANS TO PAYCHEX REGARDLESS OF HOW WELL A COMPANY COULD ADAPT. HIGHER SALARIED EMPLOYEES WERE ABLE OR TO -- WERE ABLE TO TRANSITION AND REMOTE -- AND WORK REMOTELY WHILE MANY LOWER INCOME WORKERS COULD NOT CONTINUE THEIR JOB AND LOST THEM. THE PROBLEM WAS MAGNIFIED IN MASSACHUSETTS WHERE WE HAVE A HIGH AMOUNT OF HIGH WAGE WHITE-COLLAR WORKERS. $2 BILLION, WHICH BROKE DOWN TO $15,000 PER WORKER. CONTRAST THAT TO THE HARD-HIT RESTAURANT SECTORS THAT GOT $1.2 BILLION OR $6,000 PER WORKER. >> IF YOU THINK ABOUT A GOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM, SHOULD BE SENDING THE LARGEST CHECKS TO THE HARDEST HIT GROUPS. IF ONE PERSON HOUSE -- IF ONE PERSON’S HOUSE BURNS DOWN, THEY SHOULD RECEIVE A LARGER CHECK THAN SOMEONE WHO BREAKS A WINDOW. >> HE SAYS THE NEXT ROUND OF PPP SHOULD TAKE A MORE TARGETED APPROACH. >> WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT AND GOING FORWARD, WE CAN DO BETTER WITH THE POLICIES WE DESIGN. WE SHOULD HELP FIRMS BUT WE SHOULD DO SO IN AN INTELLIGENT WAY. >> WE ARE AN INDUSTRY THAT IS PART OF A COMMUNITY. WE HAVE BEEN LOYAL TO EVERYONE AND DURING THESE TIMES, WE NEED THEIR SUPPORT. >> MASSACHUSETTS COMPANIES RECEIVED SUPPORT RANGING FROM $10 MILLION DOWN TO 100 WITH A THOUGHT -- WITH A T
Advertisement
Bay State companies most in need left out of federal relief loan program

Industries that could more easily shift to work-from-home got more federal aid

Tambo in Chelsea opened in early March with a menu full of Peruvian-inspired cuisine and craft cocktails. Now it's preparing to shut down next week for the winter, and owner Jose Duarte is hoping they can reopen in the spring. It would be better than his other restaurant, Taranta, which he closed for good after 20 years in Boston's North End.Duarte hoped he could keep Taranta open with help from the federal Paycheck Protection Program.But the terms of the loan meant he had to use most of it for payroll, and, like many restaurants, that's not the biggest expense. Duarte was paying $14,000 a month just to rent the North End space for Taranta."I think that from the beginning, those loans were not fit for us," he said. The Paycheck Protection Program was launched early in the pandemic to get a lot of money — ultimately $525 billion — to businesses nationwide, and get it to them quickly.Massachusetts companies received loans ranging from $10 million, all the way down to a few hundred dollars, for a total of about $13 billion loaned so far to Bay State businesses.But the program was designed to support businesses' payrolls. Research by MIT Sloan School of Management professor Lawrence Schmidt said the loan formula ended up favoring certain industries, not necessarily ones most affected by the pandemic."The way we designed the Paycheck Protection Program had a bit of a design flaw," he said. "The hardest-hit sectors actually tended to receive the least amount of aid." Industries that were able to adapt to the shutdown — think white-collar workers who could more easily shift to working from home — benefitted more from the Paycheck Protection Program than industries that couldn't shift to working from home, Schmidt's research showed. Another problem: Those white-collar employees are generally higher paid — think information technology or biotech workers — and lower-income workers couldn't continue their jobs and were laid off.The problem was magnified in Massachusetts, where we have a relatively large amount of higher-wage white-collar workers. Schmidt's research shows that industries classified as "professional, scientific and technical services" received $2 billion in Paycheck Protection Program loans in Massachusetts, breaking down to $15,000 per worker.In contrast, the hard-hit hotel and restaurant sectors got $1.2 billion in Paycheck Protection Program loans in Massachusetts, or about $6,000-per-worker."If you think about a good insurance program, you should be sending the largest checks to the hardest-hit groups. If someone person's house burns down, they should probably receive a larger check than someone who breaks a window," Schmidt said.Schmidt says the next round of the Paycheck Protection Program should take a more targeted approach."Clearly, with the benefit of hindsight, going forward, we can do better with the policies we design. We should help firms, but we should do so in an intelligent way," he said.

Tambo in Chelsea opened in early March with a menu full of Peruvian-inspired cuisine and craft cocktails.

Now it's preparing to shut down next week for the winter, and owner Jose Duarte is hoping they can reopen in the spring. It would be better than his other restaurant, Taranta, which he closed for good after 20 years in Boston's North End.

Advertisement
Tambo in Chelsea is set to close next week for the winter.
WCVB
Tambo in Chelsea is set to close next week for the winter.

Duarte hoped he could keep Taranta open with help from the federal Paycheck Protection Program.

But the terms of the loan meant he had to use most of it for payroll, and, like many restaurants, that's not the biggest expense. Duarte was paying $14,000 a month just to rent the North End space for Taranta.

"I think that from the beginning, those loans were not fit for us," he said.

Chef and owner Jose Duarte tried to keep his restaurants open with the help of the federal Paycheck Protection Program.
WCVB
Chef and owner Jose Duarte tried to keep his restaurants open with the help of the federal Paycheck Protection Program.

The Paycheck Protection Program was launched early in the pandemic to get a lot of money — ultimately $525 billion — to businesses nationwide, and get it to them quickly.

Massachusetts companies received loans ranging from $10 million, all the way down to a few hundred dollars, for a total of about $13 billion loaned so far to Bay State businesses.

But the program was designed to support businesses' payrolls. Research by MIT Sloan School of Management professor Lawrence Schmidt said the loan formula ended up favoring certain industries, not necessarily ones most affected by the pandemic.

"The way we designed the Paycheck Protection Program had a bit of a design flaw," he said. "The hardest-hit sectors actually tended to receive the least amount of aid."

Prof. Lawrence Schmidt of the MIT Sloan School of Management has analyzed the PPP program's tendency to fund businesses that were more able to adapt to working from home.
WCVB
Prof. Lawrence Schmidt of the MIT Sloan School of Management has analyzed the PPP program’s tendency to fund businesses that were more able to adapt to working from home.

Industries that were able to adapt to the shutdown — think white-collar workers who could more easily shift to working from home — benefitted more from the Paycheck Protection Program than industries that couldn't shift to working from home, Schmidt's research showed.

Another problem: Those white-collar employees are generally higher paid — think information technology or biotech workers — and lower-income workers couldn't continue their jobs and were laid off.

The problem was magnified in Massachusetts, where we have a relatively large amount of higher-wage white-collar workers.

Schmidt's research shows that industries classified as "professional, scientific and technical services" received $2 billion in Paycheck Protection Program loans in Massachusetts, breaking down to $15,000 per worker.

In contrast, the hard-hit hotel and restaurant sectors got $1.2 billion in Paycheck Protection Program loans in Massachusetts, or about $6,000-per-worker.

"If you think about a good insurance program, you should be sending the largest checks to the hardest-hit groups. If someone person's house burns down, they should probably receive a larger check than someone who breaks a window," Schmidt said.

Schmidt says the next round of the Paycheck Protection Program should take a more targeted approach.

"Clearly, with the benefit of hindsight, going forward, we can do better with the policies we design. We should help firms, but we should do so in an intelligent way," he said.